that use it are valid.
Merged revisions 53047-53048 via svnmerge from
https://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk
........
r53047 | danieljames | 2009-05-16 15:17:20 +0100 (Sat, 16 May 2009) | 1 line
Fix some validation errors.
........
r53048 | danieljames | 2009-05-16 15:23:59 +0100 (Sat, 16 May 2009) | 1 line
Use a local copy of the valid HTML 4.01 icon.
........
[SVN r53258]
Fixes#2392.
Change includes of <cmath> to <boost/config/no_tr1/config.hpp>.
Previously if Boost.TR1 was in the include path then including <cmath> pulls in all the new TR1 math functions, which in turn also requires linking to an external library. With auto-linking support this requires that library to have been built and be present in the library search path, even if the actual library under use is header only.
[SVN r49314]
Previously if Boost.TR1 was in the include path then including <cmath> pulls in all the new TR1 math functions, which in turn also requires linking to an external library. With auto-linking support this requires that library to have been built and be present in the library search path, even if the actual library under use is header only.
Fixes#2392.
[SVN r49254]
From Guillaume Melquiond Tue Dec 5 10:13:03 2006
X-Apparently-To: ahd6974-boostorg -at- yahoo.com via 68.142.206.151; Tue, 05 Dec 2006 10:13:22 -0800
X-Originating-IP: [140.77.167.16]
Return-Path: <guillaume.melquiond -at- ens-lyon.fr>
Authentication-Results: mta300.mail.re4.yahoo.com from=ens-lyon.fr; domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
Received: from 140.77.167.16 (EHLO pilet.ens-lyon.fr) (140.77.167.16) by mta300.mail.re4.yahoo.com with SMTP; Tue, 05 Dec 2006 10:13:22 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pilet.ens-lyon.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129B515BBB3 for <ahd6974-boostorg -at- yahoo.com>; Tue, 5 Dec 2006 19:13:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pilet.ens-lyon.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pilet [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23702-21 for <ahd6974-boostorg -at- yahoo.com>; Tue, 5 Dec 2006 19:13:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [140.77.13.110] (unknown [140.77.13.110]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by pilet.ens-lyon.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C6E15BB8B for <ahd6974-boostorg -at- yahoo.com>; Tue, 5 Dec 2006 19:13:16 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: [boost] Need your permission to correct license & copyright issues
From: "Guillaume Melquiond" <guillaume.melquiond -at- ens-lyon.fr> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
To: ahd6974-boostorg -at- yahoo.com [Edit - Delete]
In-Reply-To: <20061204155943.25677.qmail@web33503.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <20061204155943.25677.qmail@web33503.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 19:13:03 +0100
Message-Id: <1165342383.8556.52.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ens-lyon.fr
Content-Length: 787
Le lundi 04 décembre 2006 à 07:59 -0800, Andreas Huber a écrit :
> Hello Sylvain & Guillaume
>
> Quite a while ago it was decided that every file that goes into the
> 1.34 release of the Boost distribution (www.boost.org) needs uniform
> license and copyright information. For more information please see:
>
> <http://www.boost.org/more/license_info.html>
I know about this page. But it does not seem clear to me that the
license is fine for documentation files (they are the only ones missing
a license statement, the code is fine). Especially as the first question
of the FAQ only speaks about "source and header files".
Anyway, I will let you judge of whether the license is adapted or not;
and I give you permission to do the following on the files of the
documentation:
> 1. Replace the old license text with:
>
> "Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. (See
> accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at
> http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)"
>
> 2. (Optional) Run all html through HTML Tidy <http://tidy.sf.net>
Best regards,
Guillaume
PS: you may want to take a look at your mail server, as your mails are
categorized as spam because of the following checks:
- DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
- DNS_FROM_RFC_POST Envelope sender in postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
- DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS Envelope sender in whois.rfc-ignorant.org
[SVN r36507]
Allow building of shared versions of some Boost.Test libraries.
Adjust tests to use always use static linking to Boost.Test, since
linking to the shared version requires test changes.
Patch from Juergen Hunold.
[SVN r35990]
Adjust tests to use always use static linking to Boost.Test, since
linking to the shared version requires test changes.
Patch from Juergen Hunold.
[SVN r35989]
