Proper fixes for Borland, IBM, and EDG (we hope)
[SVN r15405]
This commit is contained in:
parent
0bbd93e7a0
commit
18a66d5e2e
@ -31,21 +31,19 @@ struct integral_c
|
||||
|
||||
// have to #ifdef here: some compilers don't like the 'N + 1' form (MSVC),
|
||||
// while some other don't like 'value + 1' (Borland)
|
||||
#if defined(__BORLANDC__)
|
||||
BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(T, next_value = (value + 1));
|
||||
BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(T, prior_value = (value - 1));
|
||||
typedef integral_c<T, (N+1)> next;
|
||||
typedef integral_c<T, (N-1)> prior;
|
||||
#elif defined(__IBMCPP__) || defined(__EDG_VERSION__) && __EDG_VERSION__ <= 241
|
||||
#if defined(__EDG_VERSION__) && __EDG_VERSION__ <= 241
|
||||
private:
|
||||
BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(T, next_value = (N + 1));
|
||||
BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(T, prior_value = (N - 1));
|
||||
public:
|
||||
typedef integral_c<T, next_value> next;
|
||||
typedef integral_c<T, prior_value> prior;
|
||||
#elif defined(__BORLANDC__) || defined(__IBMCPP__)
|
||||
typedef integral_c<T, (N + 1)> next;
|
||||
typedef integral_c<T, (N - 1)> prior;
|
||||
#else
|
||||
BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(T, next_value = (value + 1));
|
||||
BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(T, prior_value = (value - 1));
|
||||
typedef integral_c<T, next_value> next;
|
||||
typedef integral_c<T, prior_value> prior;
|
||||
typedef integral_c<T, (value + 1)> next;
|
||||
typedef integral_c<T, (value - 1)> prior;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
// enables uniform function call syntax for families of overloaded
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user