test/doc/test_organization/unary_tests.qbk
Gennadiy Rozental b011e02349 copyright update
2015-10-19 14:14:43 +02:00

77 lines
3.7 KiB
Plaintext

[/
/ Copyright (c) 2003 Boost.Test contributors
/
/ Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. (See accompanying
/ file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)
/]
[section:param_test Parametrized test cases]
[caution the functionalities presented on this page have been superseded by the
[link boost_test.tests_organization.test_cases.test_case_generation Data-driven test case] facility.]
Some tests are required to be repeated for a series of different input parameters. One way to achieve this is
manually register a test case for each parameter as in the previous examples. You can also invoke a test function with
all parameters manually from within your test case, like this:
``
void single_test( int i )
{
BOOST_CHECK( /* test assertion */ );
}
void combined_test()
{
int params[] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 };
std::for_each( params, params+5, &single_test );
}
``
The __UTF__ presents a better solution for this problem: the unary function based test case, also referred as
['parametrized test case]. The unary test function can be a free function, unary functor (for example created
with `boost::bind`) or unary method of a class with bound test class instance). The test function is converted
into test case using the macro `BOOST_PARAM_TEST_CASE`. The macro expects a collection of parameters (passed as
two input iterators) and an unary test function:
``
BOOST_PARAM_TEST_CASE(test_function, params_begin, params_end);
``
`BOOST_PARAM_TEST_CASE` creates an instance of the test case generator. When passed to the method
[memberref boost::unit_test::test_suite::add `test_suite::add`], the generator produces a separate sub test case
for each parameter in the parameters collection and registers it immediately in a test suite.
Each test case is based on a test function with the parameter bound by value,
even if the test function expects a parameter by reference. The fact that parameter value is stored along with
bound test function releases you from necessity to manage parameters lifetime. For example, they can be defined
in the test module initialization function scope.
All sub test case names are deduced from the macro argument `test_function`. If you prefer to assign different
names, you have to use the underlying [headerref boost/test/parameterized_test.hpp `make_test_case`] interface instead. Both test cases creation and
registration are performed in the test module initialization function.
The parametrized test case facility is preferable to the approach in the example above, since execution of
each sub test case is guarded and counted independently. It produces a better test log/results report (in
example above in case of failure you can't say which parameter is at fault) and allows you to test against
all parameters even if one of them causes termination a particular sub test case.
In comparison with a manual test case registration for each parameter approach the parametrized test case
facility is more concise and easily extensible.
In following simple example the same test, implemented in `free_test_function`, is
performed for 5 different parameters. The parameters are defined in the test module initialization function
scope. The master test suite contains 5 independent test cases.
[bt_example example07..Unary free function based test case..run-fail]
Next example is similar, but instead of a free function it uses a method of a class. Even though parameters are
passed into test method by reference you can still define them in the test module initialization function scope.
This example employs the alternative test module initialization function specification.
[bt_example example08..Unary class method based test case..run-fail]
[endsect] [/test case with arity]
[/EOF]