f3e09f36 hooked a dependency on libatomic on 32 bit machines if Clang is
used because compilation failed with:
`std::__atomic_base<unsigned long long>::load(std::memory_order) const':
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/6.1.1/../../../../include/c++/6.1.1/bits/atomic_base.h:396:
undefined reference to `__atomic_load_8'
But that does not happen on FreeBSD. The problem is likely that on Linux
Clang tries to use GCC-provided C++11 library. Further,
__atomic_load_8() (for 8-byte integers) is not readily available on 32
bit machines. From https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Atomic/GCCMM: "When lock
free instructions are not available (either through hardware or OS
support) atomic operations are left as function calls to be resolved by
a library."
This patch allows to filter out sensitive information for queries that rely on the pool state, when running in restricted mode.
This filtering is only applied to data sent back to RPC queries. Results of inline commands typed locally in the daemon are not affected.
In practice, when running with `--restricted-rpc`:
* get_transaction_pool will list relayed transactions with the fields "last relayed time" and "received time" set to zero.
* get_transaction_pool will not list transaction that have do_not_relay set to true, and will not list key images that are used only for such transactions
* get_transaction_pool_hashes.bin will not list such transaction
* get_transaction_pool_stats will not count such transactions in any of the aggregated values that are computed
The implementation does not make filtering the default, so developers should be mindful of this if they add new RPC functionality.
Fixes#2590.
Transactions in the txpool are marked when another transaction
is seen double spending one or more of its inputs.
This is then exposed wherever appropriate.
Note that being marked with this "double spend seen" flag does
NOT mean this transaction IS a double spend and will never be
mined: it just means that the network has seen at least another
transaction spending at least one of the same inputs, so care
should be taken to wait for a few confirmations before acting
upon that transaction (ie, mostly of use for merchants wanting
to accept unconfirmed transactions).
ff7745bb Edited test readme for accuracy and depth (Cole Lightfighter)
c300ae56 Added test documentation & Keccak unit test (Cole Lightfighter)
f6119a8e Added test documentation & Keccak unit test (Cole Lightfighter)
d0463312 fix libwallet api test after api change (Jaquee)
a46c1eed Wallet2: Don't throw when subaddress label doesn't exist (Jaquee)
086b7db2 Wallet API: default values for account and subaddr index (Jaquee)
